39 F. high in the Twin Cities yesterday.
28 F. average high for February 13.
31 F. high on February 13, 2012.
Sunrise: 7:15 am
Sunset: 5:40 pm. We’re picking up just over 2 minutes of additional daylight every day now.
7-8 days from now: next best chance for accumulating snow. Details below.
A Wardrobe Mystery. Parka or light jacket? Depends on the day. After peaking in the low 30s today temperatures tumble tonight, holding in the teens Friday and Saturday before blipping upward Sunday and Monday (another thaw!) Yet another cold front surges south Tuesday and Wednesday, not as numbing as 2-3 weeks ago, but cold enough for most locals.
Something For The Entire Family. No significant snows are expected until (possibly) the end of next week, when a few inches of snow may fall from a storm tracking south/east of Minnesota. ECMWF (European) highs above in Celsius.
Snow Potential Late Next Week. My confidence level is still (very) low – considering any accumulating snow is still 7-8 days away. But the ECMWF model is bringing southern moisture across the Plains into the Great Lakes, throwing a shield of snow into the Upper Midwest. Will it stay too far south/east? Possibly. It looks cold enough for all snow with this one, but the final track will determine whether we pick up an inch or two, or something “plowable”. Map: WSI.
On Track For A Busy Tornado Year? We’ve had 3 major tornado outbreaks in each of the last 3 months. Here’s a closer look at how a fading drought over the Upper Midwest may mean a higher tornado count. YouTube clip courtesy of WeatherNation TV: “WeatherNation Chief Meteorologist Paul Douglas recaps the recent tornado outbreaks from December, January, and February and provides insight into the rarity of these winter-season tornadoes.”
Latest Findings On Sandy – 7 Crazy Months In New York City Area. Here’s today’s edition of “Climate Matters” for WeatherNation TV, a 2:30 YouTube look at why New Yorkers must be shaking their fists at the sky right about now, and the latest NOAA findings on Sandy: “New York has seen it all in the past seven months. Tornado touchdowns, destruction from Superstorm Sandy and a historic Nor’Easter. Meteorologist Paul Douglas takes a look the recent extreme weather impacting the Northeast. Plus the National Hurricane Center just released its tropical cyclone report regarding Hurricane Sandy and we look at the highlights.”
NHC: Hurricane Sandy Caused $50 Billion In Damage, Killed 147. Here’s an excerpt of good summary of a recent NOAA report on Sandy from The Sun-Sentinel: “Hurricane Sandy caused almost $50 billion in damage when it struck the East Coast in October, making it the second costliest storm behind Hurricane Katrina to hit the United States since 1900. That’s according to the final Sandy report, released by the National Hurricane Center on Tuesday. The report also noted that Sandy killed a total of 147 people, with 72 of those in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast U.S. Sandy was a “a classic late-season hurricane in the southwestern Caribbean Sea,” the report said. Before striking the U.S. coastline, it hit Jamaica as a Category 1 hurricane, Cuba as a Category 3 and the Bahamas as a Category 1…” (Sandy photo courtesy of FEMA).
* Sandy was America’s second costliest storm, second only to Katrina in 2005. Details from Huffington Post.
Hurricane’s Downgrade Undercut Warnings, Report Finds. Sandy was a (freak) mash-up of fading hurricane and major Nor’easter. Technically it wasn’t a hurricane as it approached the New Jersey shoreline, and not using the hurricane terminology (“Hurricane Warnings”, etc) may have given the impression that Sandy wasn’t a dangerous storms. Of course nothing could be further from the truth. Here’s an excerpt from a New York Times story: “…Issuing a hurricane warning and then downgrading the storm to a post-tropical cyclone could have devastating consequences, emergency management officials across the region warned agency officials, with people deciding that the storm did not pose a serious threat. “We could have continued to call it a hurricane for one or two days,” said James Franklin, the chief of hurricane forecasts for the center. But that would have been a lie, he said, and “would have utterly destroyed the credibility of the agency in the long run….”
Royal Academy Of Engineering Says UK Better Prepared For Solar Superstorm. The solar cycle peaks in the coming months, and there’s a fair amount of angst about the risk of a “super-flare”, something that could bring down the grid. Alarmist hype? I certainly hope so. Here’s a snippet of an interesting story at Gizmag.com: “Britain is better prepared for a solar superstorm than many countries, including the United States. The Royal Academy of Engineering has released a multi-disciplinary report on space weather’s impact on Britain, as part of the UK National Risk Assessment. The declassified portion of the assessment shows the level of UK preparedness in the face of severe solar storms, and outlines the dangers Earth faces from superstorms and how to avoid or mitigate damage…”
Image credit above: “Artist’s impression of the interaction of the Sun and the Earth’s magnetosphere.” (Image: NASA)
Can Emprimus Save Civilization? During every 13 year solar cycle there is a 1 in 9 risk of a once-in-a-century solar storm, potentially big enough to bring down portions of the electrical grid. As if we don’t all have enough to worry about. Here’s an excerpt of a fascinating story from Twin Cities Business: “When George Anderson looks up, he sees national vulnerability. It isn’t asteroids that worry Anderson, and he’s unconcerned about global warming. Instead, he thinks a cloud of magnetically charged gas is going to float down from the sky and scramble our electronics. Data centers from coast to coast will be erased in a flash. Airplanes will fall from the sky. Blackouts will plunge the country into prolonged food and water shortages, eventually leading to lawlessness and chaos. It sounds like the setup for a screenplay by Lost creator J. J. Abrams, but Anderson insists it isn’t science fiction. He’s stockpiling food for his family. He’s also been pouring his personal fortune into a new company called Emprimus that is starting to be noticed, and that he hopes can help save civilization. While he’s not the only one who’s alarmed about the risk, he faces stiff headwinds from a slow-to-change power generating industry. Can a business founded on an iffy doomsday scenario primed to occur as early as next year gain traction in time to make a difference?…”
Image credit above: Photography by Travis Anderson. “Engineer and Emprimus founder George Anderson“.
More Signs Point To An Apple iWatch. Dick Tracy, here we come. Gizmag.com has the story (and speculation); here’s an excerpt: “What will Apple’s next big product be? Two months ago, if you’d polled a room full of analysts, most would have likely answered a TV set. Recently, though, a picture has been forming of a smaller and more portable innovation: the smartwatch. Three major media outlets have now separately reported that Apple is indeed working on an iWatch. Following previous reports from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg now adds that Apple has a team of 100 product designers working on the smartwatch. The group – which includes hardware, software, and marketing specialists – has reportedly grown within the last year…”
TV Zombie Attack Warning A False Alarm. Really? And here I’ve been hiding in my safe room for the last 48 hours. This is funny, in a tragic sort of way. Here’s an excerpt from The LaCrosse Tribune: “A goof-up by some La Crosse disc jockeys caused WKBT-TV viewers to hear a warning of a zombie attack. The message went out shortly after 7:30 a.m. Tuesday when the hosts of the Z-93 morning show were joking about how hackers broke into the Emergency Alert System of a Montana TV station Monday and sent out the bogus warning. The problem: Z-93 is the primary station in the local emergency network, and when they played a tape of the hoax, the alert tones triggered WKBT’s receiver, which automatically rebroadcast the signal…”
Paul’s Conservation Minnesota Outlook for the Twin Cities and all of Minnesota:
* there’s a potential for some accumulating snow next Thursday and Friday.
** photo above courtesy of MTsevereweather and WeatherNation TV.
“…A recent review of every peer-reviewed scientific study published on climate change science in the last two decades (13,950) by James Powell, the former president of three prestigious American universities, found just 24 of them questioned whether climate change was real, and was caused by greenhouse gas emissions…” – from a U.S. News and World Report Op-Ed below.
Bill McKibben Is Coming To Minnesota. I’m looking forward to talking about Minnesota’s weather and climate trends, and then introducing Bill McKibben next week at the St. Thomas (next Wednesday evening). Here’s a guy that really needs no introduction: author, leader and environmentalist, founder of 350.org. From Paul Thompson, Director at coolplanetmn.org: “How can we connect people with their desire to take action on a rapidly changing climate? Can people actually do something to alter the future of history? What season to Minnesotans relate to more than any other? At Cool Planet (www.coolplanetmn.org) we believe that people will take the ncessary steps to address climate change when they make a personal connection with what is happening in THEIR world.
Bill McKibben, arguably the global leader for climate action, is coming to ski the American Birkebeiner Ski Marathon in NW Wisconsin. As cross-country skiers we have noticed a distinct lack of predictable snow over the past decade. Minnesota winters without snow? That’s just not right. Here’s what some Minnesotans/Wisconsinites are saying about “What I Love About Winter”:
Grace, age 11, Edina: “I love, love, love ice skating and going sledding because I love the feeling of wind and snow in my face.”
Jen, age 26, Whittier Neighborhood, Minneapolis: “When we actually get the snow I remember getting growing up.”
Jonathan, age 54, Cable, WI: “The crunch of snow underfoot. Viewing the moon on a frigid evening. Watching my daughter make snow forts.”
Kamin, age 54, Hayward, WI: “Finding wold tracks in the snow, snow shoeing and cross country skiing.”
How do we get together to protect the things we love about this season that defines Minnesota and Wisconsin?
Obama Needs To Lay Out A Plan On Climate Crisis. Here’s a video and portion of an Op-Ed from CNN.com: “…As if the warnings from scientists weren’t enough, in 2012 — the hottest year on record in the contiguous U.S. — we saw the true face of climate change: freak storms, raging wildfires, a new Dust Bowl in the heartland and devastating damages. Most heartbreakingly, innocent lives were lost. Here’s what Obama can do to help stop climate change — and what he should announce in his speech on Tuesday night.
Obama Cites Storms, Drought, To Build Case For Climate Action. Here’s a snippet from a story at The National Journal: “...If Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will,” he said. That means he’s preparing to work with the heads of all his Cabinet agencies on a suite of executive-level climate change actions that he can enact on his own. Chief among them: Environmental Protection Agency regulations that would force existing coal-fired power plants to cut their carbon pollution, and a slate of actions across agencies aimed at preparing U.S. cities and towns to adapt to the impacts of climate change, including increased flooding, drought, and more extreme storms. He also plans to create an Energy Security Trust Fund, which will take revenue generated by oil and gas drilling on public funds and channel it for clean energy research and development (while the White House can use its authority to create the fund, it will need Congress to act to allow it to use the fossil-fuel revenue for clean-tech research)…”
On Climate Change Obama Delivered. The rhetoric was powerful in his State of the Union address, but will the words be backed up by deeds, by real action? With a hopelessly divided Congress will anything (tangible) get done? Here’s an excerpt of an Op Ed at Politico: “…We just wrapped up the hottest year on record across the continental United States, accompanied by the worst drought in half a century. Folks are hurting in the heartland, where crops have withered and pastures died. Businesses are suffering across the nation’s great middle, where barges drag bottom in the Mississippi. And cities are reeling from devastation and loss from hurricanes and so-called super storms. The president has seen in this hardship the face of climate change and the rising costs it brings. That toll, he rightly asserted in his State of the Union address, will only continue to climb unless we decide, as a nation, to take a stand…”
Photo credit above: “The author says this isn’t a time for hesitation and half-hearted measures“. | John Shinkle at POLITICO
Why Tokyo Has More To Fear From Sea Level Rise Than Vancouver. Not all coastal areas are (equally) threatened by rising sea levels, the result of warming/expansion and melting of Greenland and Antarctic ice. Here’s an excerpt of a story at The Washington Post: “…Some coastal areas have more to fear from climate change than others. Tokyo and Sydney, for instance, are likely to see bigger sea-level rises than Vancouver or London. That’s according to a new study that attempts to model the oddities of the rising oceans. Climatologists have known for many years that the seas are creeping up on us. As humans warm the planet, the world’s ice caps and glaciers are melting and the oceans are expanding. Various projections have sea levels on pace to rise between 2 and 7 feet by 2100. What makes this so tricky to prepare for, however, is that sea levels won’t rise evenly everywhere. There are huge variations. In some regions, like the Mississippi Delta, the land is sinking, due to sediment erosion or oil drilling. In other places, strong wind and ocean currents can warp the waters and affect local sea levels. Meanwhile, the shrinking ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica have their own gravitational pull, creating further imbalances….”
* graphic above courtesy of New Scientist, which has an interactive graphic showing how sea level rise will vary across the globe. Coastal New England is much more vulnerable than the Pacific Northwest.
3 Strikes And You’re Out. Is the Republican party morphing into the anti-science party? Here’s a snippet of an Op Ed at U.S. News and World Report: “…The problem here is that the scientific community isn’t split. A recent review of every peer-reviewed scientific study published on climate change science in the last two decades (13,950) by James Powell, the former president of three prestigious American universities, found just 24 of them questioned whether climate change was real, and was caused by greenhouse gas emissions. The remaining 13,926 said climate change is happening and we’re making it worse. That’s a scientific consensus. Only conspiracy nuts who think the entire scientific community is one, big, powerful cabal don’t understand a scientific consensus when they see one…”
The New Abolitionists. Global Warming Is The Great Moral Crisis Of Our Time. Here’s an excerpt of a story at thephoenix.com: “…This is not going away. At this point of unimaginable threats on the horizon, this is what hope looks like. In these times of a morally bankrupt government that has sold out its principles, this is what patriotism looks like. With countless lives on the line, this is what love looks like, and it will only grow. The choice you are making today is what side are you on.” A month after DeChristopher speaks those words, the largest civil-disobedience action in a generation begins in front of the White House, where 1,253 climate activists are arrested protesting the Keystone XL pipeline, the project that would tap the second-largest carbon deposit on Earth. (This Sunday, February 17, tens of thousands more will converge on Washington to demand that Barack Obama reject the pipeline once and for all.)…”
Obama Cries Out For Climate-Change Solutions, But What Happens Now? Here’s another perspective on the President’s State of the Union Address, from The Atlantic: “….But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will,” he said. “I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.” The most obvious path here is for the Environmental Protection Agency to crack down on carbon-dioxide emissions from already-existing power plants and to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant. But there are a raft of other options Obama could undertake, too. He could use his authority to block the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring dirty tar sands through the U.S. to be exported and burned abroad. He could issue new energy-efficiency standards for appliances and building. In the State of the Union Obama offered the goal of “cut[ting] in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next 20 years.” Much of the regulations to do this could be executed without congressional action…” (Photo credit above: Reuters).