February 10, 1965: A snowstorm dumps 15 inches of snow at Duluth over two days.
February 10, 1861: An ice storm impacts Elk River. Coatings of 1/2 inch of ice are reported. The ice broke off many large branches and saplings were bent to the ground.
February 10, 1857: Extreme cold at Fort Ripley. E.J. Baily, Assistant Surgeon notes: ‘Spirit thermometer -50 at 6am. Mercury frozen in charcoal cup. Spirit thermometer at Little Falls 16 miles from the fort -56 at 6am. The lowest degree of cold on record in the territory’.
Goosebump Alert – Whiff of Spring Next Week?
My Navy son is stationed in San Diego, a palm tree-studded oasis of warmth and sanity in southern California, a city with the distinction of having the best climate in the USA. “The weather is here, wish you were beautiful!” the text read.
Some days I fantasize about predicting the weather in a sunny, warm (boring) city. It might be fun for a couple of weeks, but I’d be climbing the walls before long. The variability, the seasons, the weather-specific traditions, the ebb and flow of the weather? Those are the things I would miss.
And it’s not like we’re having a “Polar Vortex” winter – now we gripe when it gets below zero. In the 70s we had consecutive WEEKS below zero. This is still a pale imitation of the winters your grandparents muddled through.
A clipper brushes far southwest MN with snow today. I could see an inch or 2 Sunday, followed by a sweeping thaw next week as Pacific air charges east. 30s and a few 40s are likely.
Is this the last significant cold shot of winter? Probably. Cold waves are possible in March, but fairly rare. Spring is coming. Trust me.
Widening Your Bubble. “Paul, I’m cold! How can the planet be warming?” It’s probably in our caveman DNA to look out the window and assume it’s this way (everywhere). It’s challenging keeping a global perspective, especially over long periods of time. That’s why climate scientists analyze trends going back many hundreds of thousands of years. It’s colder than average here today, but much of the northern hemisphere is still warmer than average as of Wednesday morning. Map: Climate Reanalyzer.
Clipped by a Clipper. Today’s swirl of low pressure pinwheeling out of Alberta (imagine that) will drop a couple inches of powder on far southwestern Minnesota. Clouds will thicken ini the metro, but any flakes should stay south and west of a line from Alexandria to Willmar to Mankato. 84-hour accumulated snow product: NOAA NAM and AerisWeather.
Light At The End of the Tunnel. 4 more character-building days, then a significant thaw next week with 30s returning, even a chance of 40s by the end of next week, according to European guidance. The next clipper pushes a shield of light snow across the state over the weekend; maybe an inch or two – the pattern not ripe for big storms (of any flavor) anytime soon. Source: WeatherSpark.
Coldest Morning: Saturday. Under the center of a Canadian high pressure bubble skies will be clear, winds light, conditions ideal for a rapid loss of thermal energy. Translation: Saturday morning is going to be cold with wake-up temperatures close to -10F in the suburbs. Source: Aeris Enterprise.
Lake Effect – in February? A steady stream of polar air passing over the relatively warm waters of the Great Lakes will spark very significant lake effect snows in the coming days; the best chance of plowable snows into next week over the Minnesota Arrowhead from a weekend clipper. 10-Day snowfall accumulation: NOAA GFS and AerisWeather.
Spring Preview from AccuWeather. I envision a milder than average spring, based on the current El Nino, which is now bigger than the one that hit in 1997-98. The spring of 1998 brought a rash of extreme weather and severe thunderstorms with large hail; I vaguely recall nearly $2 billion in damage in1998, much of that hail-related. Does that automatically mean a similar spring is imminent. No. Every El Nino is different, with varying symptoms and impacts, but don’t be shocked if we see more severe storms (earlier than usual). Here’s a clip from AccuWeather.com: “…However, that will change as April progresses and storms track from the Southwest, leading to increased severe weather in the central and southern Plains, Mississippi Valley and Midwest. “Intense warmth ahead of these storms comming out of the West is going to promote severe weather. Those are the ingredients you need,” Pastelok said. “The thing that worries me the most is that it could turn into heavy rain producers that could lead to flooding. And we’ve seen lots of flooding already over this past winter season in the Mississippi Valley...”
March Preview. Although February may wind up a little colder than previous runs of NOAA’s CFSv2 (Climate Forecast System) were predicting a few weeks ago, the model continues to insist that El Nino-warmed winds will result in a much warmer than average March for much of western and central Canada and the northern tier states of the USA. We’ll see, but the model has been amazingly consistent. Map source: WeatherBell.
Has El Nino Abandoned L.A.? Pacific-fueled storms have whacked the Pacific Northwest and northern California, but it’s still abnormally warm and (mostly) dry across SoCal. Here’s a clip from The Los Angeles Times: “…Southern California is still well below average rainfall, with downtown L.A. reporting 52% of normal since Oct. 1. But deluge after deluge to the north has built back the snowpack — it’s 105% of normal in the Sierra Nevada — and begun to refill drought-depleted reservoirs. For Southern California, the strong El Niño “hasn’t been a great predictor so far this winter,” said Stanford University climate scientist Daniel Swain, and “hasn’t been influencing the atmosphere in exactly the same way that we have seen.” A massive ridge of high pressure is keeping much of California dry and warm this week. In Southern California, that brought dry winds and temperatures that approached 90…” (Graphic: L.A. Times).
NOAA and NASA Team Up To Investigate Strongest El Nino on Record. It’s looking even bigger and more pervasive than the previous record warm stain in the Pacific in 1997-98. Here’s an excerpt from The Guardian: “America’s two leading climate science agencies are conducting an unprecedented survey via land, sea and air to investigate the current El Niño event and better understand its impact on weather systems that have brought both parched and soaking conditions to North America. The project, which will conclude in March, will deploy resources from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) and Nasa to analyze one of the strongest El Niños on record. El Niño is a periodic phenomenon in which parts of the eastern Pacific warm, causing a ripple effect for weather around the world…”
Animation credit: NOAA Climate Prediction Center.
El Nino Seems To Have Smashed 1997 Record in Past Three Months. With additional perspective on today’s weather headline here’s an excerpt from New Scientist: “The evidence is in: we seem to be living though the most extreme of extreme weather events. Last year, New Scientist reported early indications that the present El Niño event is probably the strongest ever recorded. A new analysis backs that view. El Niño is a periodic phenomenon that occurs when ocean temperatures warm in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean. Even before this current event began, forecasters warned that it was likely to wreak havoc with the world’s weather...”
Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies: earth.nullschool.net
Is Climate Change Making El Ninos Worse? That Remains a Scientific Mystery. The jury is still out. Here’s an excerpt at Texas Climate News: “…But what about the deadly Texas downpours of last May, when the ENSO was developing? Was global warming partly to blame? Utah State University researchers assert that it was. They said greenhouse gas emissions brought a “significant increase” in abnormal rainfall in Texas and Oklahoma. Others aren’t convinced. Even if global warming is strengthening the atmosphere’s response to El Niños – unproven, Nielsen-Gammon said – the current one needed little help…”
Graphic credit above: “The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration provides this summary description of the phenomenon that produces El Niño and La Niña conditions: “El Niño and La Niña are the warm and cool phases of a recurring climate pattern across the tropical Pacific—the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, or ‘ENSO’ for short. The pattern can shift back and forth irregularly every two to seven years, and each phase triggers predictable disruptions of temperature, precipitation, and winds. These changes disrupt the large-scale air movements in the tropics, triggering a cascade of global side effects.”
Drought Remains “Very Serious” in California. Recent rains and heavy snows are putting a dent in the drought, but the long term implications are still uncertain. Here’s a clip from Capital Public Radio: “…January brought above-average precipitation to California, but the narrative says more is needed to end the state’s historic four-year drought. “Despite heavy rainfall in January, an above-average snowpack and rising reservoirs in many areas, the California State Water Resources Control Board recently approved an 8-month extension of existing drought-related emergency regulations,” the report says. “This is a reminder that although El Niño-related precipitation has been bountiful so far this winter, the drought situation in California remains very serious...”
New Lyme-Disease-Causing Bacteria Discovered by Mayo Researchers. Here’s another day-brightener, courtesy of MinnPost: “Researchers at the Mayo Clinic have discovered a new species of bacteria in the Upper Midwest that causes Lyme disease. They have named the bacteria Borrelia mayonii, after the two brothers, William and James Mayo, who founded the Rochester, Minnesota, clinic. Before this finding, which was published Monday in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, the only species believed to cause Lyme disease in North America was Borrelia burgdorferi...”
Image credit: Blacklegged ticks, Minnesota Department of Health.
Driven by Power Outages and Savings, Towns Look to Microgrid. Is smaller better, more secure, resilient and ultimately sustainable? Here’s an excerpt from The Associated Press: “An upstate New York town that repeatedly found itself without power for days during a string of storms is planning a dramatic step by pulling its municipal buildings entirely off the electric grid. The decision by Nassau to rely on solar, wind, landfill gas and battery storage by 2020 puts the town of 5,000 near Albany on the leading edge of a national campaign to develop “microgrids” designed to make communities more energy independent and the grid more resilient. While only a few communities have become early adopters and natural disasters have been a driving force, proponents say there is also growing interest nationwide from places looking to save money by selling excess power to utilities and to help the environment...”
Global Initiative Introduces First Proposal to Reduce Airplane Pollution. The Guardian reports; here’s the intro: “Governments proposed for the first time on Monday to reduce climate pollution from airplanes, plugging one of the biggest loopholes in last December’s landmark Paris agreement. The global initiative was a first attempt to halt carbon emissions from air travel – one of the fastest growing sources of climate pollution. In a call with reporters, White House officials described the standards as “a huge deal”, noting that the aviation authority has also proposed an aspirational goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2020…”
File photo: Alamy.
China’s Experimental Fusion Reactor Maintains Superheated Hydrogen Plasma for 102 Seconds. We’re getting ever-closer; here’s an excerpt at Gizmag: “A bit of friendly competition never hurt anyone. China’s EAST tokamak and Germany’s Wendelstein 7-X aren’t exactly fusion energy’s answer to Messi and Ronaldo, but through their own flashes of individual brilliance the reactors might one day command the world’s attention in a much more important way. Wendelstein 7-X made headlines last week after generating a quarter-of-a-second pulse of hydrogen plasma, and now scientists at China’s Institute of Physical Science have flexed their fusion muscle to sustain the gas for an impressive 102 seconds…”
Photo credit: “China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak reactor.” (Credit: IPP)
Economists Keep Saying We Should Put a Price on Nature. Now They’ve Finally Done It. Factoring in the real (socialized) costs is essential in any discussion of costs and benefits; here’s an excerpt at The Washington Post: “Putting a price on nature may seem like an impossible task, but economists believe that finding a way to calculate the value of natural resources is crucial when it comes to deciding whether our use of a resource is sustainable. Natural resources are capital assets, economists have argued, in the same way that land, buildings and stocks are considered assets — and spending money to protect these resources should be viewed as an investment in the future rather than just another cost. The problem is that, so far, no one has developed a good way to estimate the monetary value of natural resources. But now, a group of scholars may have finally come up with a solution...”
“Flint Isn’t An Anomaly. We’re Heading Toward a National Water Crisis.” Here’s an excerpt of an Op-Ed from Mark Ruffalo at The Washington Post: “…Sadly, there have since been numerous high-profile cases of contamination, such as in Toledo, Ohio, in 2014, where agricultural runoff and crumbling infrastructure led to an algal bloom in Lake Erie that made the city’s drinking water unsafe. Also in 2014, in West Virginia, a chemical spill contaminated the Elk River, the tap water supply for hundreds of thousands of people. This past August, 3 million gallons of contaminated water were released into the Animas River in Colorado, resulting in lead levels 3,500 times normal and arsenic levels 300 times normal, affecting many communities and farms...” (File image credit: ThinkStock).
Congressional Clocks Have a Secret Code. Let the conspiracy theories begin. Here’s an excerpt at Atlas Obscura: “…Look along the top of a Congressional wall clock, and you’ll see seven small light bulbs. Even the fancier clocks in members’ offices have them. From time to time, these will light up in particular sequences, accompanied by loud, long buzzes or series of shorter buzzes. These patterns all have meanings: they’re meant to communicate to people working on the Hill when electronic votes are called, when one chamber or the other is adjourned or in recess, and when members need to think about actually being in the Senate or House chamber…”
Photo credit: “
The answer is quite complicated, and contested. Countries have different laws governing the citizenship of babies born on their soil–either jus soli or jus sanguinis; Latin for right of the soil versus right of blood, respectively. Most countries follow jus sanguinis, which dictates that the baby can only assume citizenship via one or both parents. However, the U.S. and some of its neighbors observe the more generous jus soli, which grants automatic citizenship to babies born on their soil…”
Photo credit above: “
WEDNESDAY: Clouds increase. Chilly. Winds: N 5-10. High: 11
WEDNESDAY NIGHT: Partly cloudy and cold. Low: 0
THURSDAY: More sun, comfortably numb. Winds: W 5-10. High: 16
FRIDAY: Next shot, feels like 0 to -10F with some sun. Winds: NW 10-20. Wake-up: 9. High: 12
SATURDAY: Cobalt-blue sky, light winds. Winds: NE 5-10. Wake-up: -6. High: 9
SUNDAY: Couple inches of snow? Slick. Wake-up: 4. High: 20
MONDAY: Overcast, above average again. Winds: S 8-13. Wake-up: 15. High: 31
TUESDAY: Early flurries, slow clearing. Wake-up: 28. High: 35
* 40s are likely the latter half of next week.
Congressman Lamar Smith (R-TX) has embarked upon a witch-hunt against climate scientists at NOAA, accusing them of conspiring to fudge global temperature data. However, a new study has found that the adjustments NOAA makes to the raw temperature data bring them closer to measurements from a reference network of pristinely-located temperature stations. Before delving into the new study, it’s worthwhile to revisit the temperature adjustments that Lamar Smith disputes. Volunteers have been logging measurements from weather stations around the world for over 150 years, and climate scientists use that data to estimate the Earth’s average surface temperature...”
Photo credit above: “The U.S. Climate Reference Network consists of 114 stations, including this one in Capitol Reef National Park, Torrey, Utah.” Photograph: NOAA.
gave a speech to local residents that contained inaccurate and misleading claims about climate science and its terminology:While on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz
- Cruz claimed “none of the alarmists say ‘global warming’ anymore — now it’s ‘climate change.’ ” That’s inaccurate. Scientists still use both terms, but tend to use “climate change” more often because, in addition to warming, it refers to phenomena such as sea-level rise and changes in precipitation patterns.
- Cruz also said “climate change is the perfect pseudoscientific theory because it can never, ever, ever be disproven.” This is false. It could be, but the chances are slim. Climate change rests on the veracity of the greenhouse effect, a theory which has been repeatedly verified since it was first proposed in 1824...”
U.S. Military to War Game Climate Change Threats. Concern grows about climate volatility and weather/water/crop disruption as a “threat multiplier”, accelerating global challenges and conflicts, many of which invariably blow back on the USA. Here’s an excerpt at Climate Home: “US military planners have been ordered to war game climate change scenarios, focusing on “geopolitical and socioeconomic instability” linked to extreme weather. A new directive says forces need to undertake joint training exercises with allies to “enhance capacity” and “improve tactics” for tackling impacts linked to global warming. “Mission planning and execution must include identification and assessment of the effects of climate change on the DoD [department of defence] mission,” it reads...” (Image source: U.S. Military, Flickr).
A bit over a year after identifying climate change as a “significant challenge” for the US military, the US Department of Defense has given its top officials orders for handling the hazards posed by a warming world. The boring-but-important 12-page document issued in January tells the armed service chiefs and top civilian officials to identify how climate change will affect their missions, figure out how to manage any risks it poses, and factor those into their planning. It gives specific tasks to various Defense Department offices and regional commands, from determining how higher sea levels or longer droughts affect US bases to what new gear might be needed to work in a thawing Arctic...”
Global Warming: Coming To An Ice Fishing Contest Near You. Here’s an excerpt from a post by climate science communicator Greg Laden: “Over the last several years, ice fishing contests, which are a big deal in Minnesota, have been repeatedly cancelled due to insufficient ice thickness on the relevant lake. Some of these contests have been permanently cancelled because the annual cancelations were becoming more frequent. Just now, the Maple Lake Ice Fishing Derby has been cancelled. That’s bad. But even more disturbing is this: Ice conditions for the Eel Pout Festival have created enough concern to prompt vehicle restrictions, according to the Cass County Sheriff’s Office...”
7 Smarter Ways To Talk About Climate Change. Some good advice from Grist; here’s an excerpt: “…There are billions and billions to be made in [the energy sector] inevitably over the coming two decades. America can lead that or can be dragged backwards into it. So what role does American business play in this transition? Like in the transition from horse carriages to cars: Do you want to produce horse carriages or be in the car business? When Google throws billions of dollars at Nest, it’s not because they want to be kind. You draw people into a commercial discussion and, again, climate is the background…”
Companies Are Misrepresenting Their Carbon Emissions. Michigan Radio has a story that is raising eyebrows; here’s the intro: “Many companies are making their carbon emissions public, to show they are doing their part to fight climate change. But new research by Lux Research indicates most companies in the U.S. are either underestimating or overestimating their emissions. Ory Zik is Vice President of Analytics for Lux Research. He says estimating one’s own carbon emissions is very difficult. That’s because electricity moves from region to region on grids…”
File photo credit: “This is not a Google data center. It’s one at the University of Hertfordshire. Data centers use a fair amount of electricity.” Credit wikieditor243 / wikimedia/commons.
Consequences for 21st Century Policy for Multi-Millenial Climate and Sea-Level Change. Here’s an abstract excerpt and link to a new paper that’s generating headlines, courtesy of Nature Climate Change: “…Here, we argue that the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, a period during which the overwhelming majority of human-caused carbon emissions are likely to occur, need to be placed into a long-term context that includes the past 20 millennia, when the last Ice Age ended and human civilization developed, and the next ten millennia, over which time the projected impacts of anthropogenic climate change will grow and persist. This long-term perspective illustrates that policy decisions made in the next few years to decades will have profound impacts on global climate, ecosystems and human societies — not just for this century, but for the next ten millennia and beyond.”
Sea Level Rise Will Last Twice as Long as Human History. With perspective on the new research highlighted above, here’s the intro to a story at Newsweek: “Huge sea-level rises caused by climate change will last far longer than the entire history of human civilization to date, according to new research, unless the brief window of opportunity of the next few decades is used to cut carbon emissions drastically. Even if global warming is capped at governments’ target of 2 degrees Celsius — which is already seen as difficult — 20 percent of the world’s population will eventually have to migrate away from coasts swamped by rising oceans. Cities including New York, London, Rio de Janeiro, Cairo, Calcutta, Jakarta and Shanghai would all be submerged...”
Graphic credit: Guardian, source: Nature Climate Change.
Blackrock: World’s Largest Investor Flags Up Climate Risk. How much exposure do you have in your portfolio? Climate Home has the story – here’s the intro: “In a letter to the heads of S&P 500 companies and top European corporations, Larry Fink expressed concern at the lack of focus on environmental and social risks in boardrooms. “For too long, companies have not considered them core to their business – even when the world’s political leaders are increasingly focused on them, as demonstrated by the Paris Climate Accord. “Over the long-term, environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues – ranging from climate change to diversity to board effectiveness – have real and quantifiable financial impacts…”
Photo credit: Suisse/Flickr.