29 F. high in the Twin Cities Wednesday.
36 F. average high on March 6.
60 F. high on March 6, 2012 (!)
0″ snow on the ground a year ago.
13″ snow on the ground right now in the Twin Cities. Oh what a difference a year makes…
New England Nor’easter. The latest (00z) NAM model shows the storm that walloped parts of Virginia with 1-2 feet (but sparing the immediate Washington D.C. area) temporarily stalling, with moisture rotating all the way around the storm, approaching from the north tonight and Friday, enhancing the potential for plowable snows from New York to Providence and Boston, maybe a cool foot of snow just inland. A southwestern storm spreads rain into Minnesota Saturday, possibly ending as a little slushy snow Sunday, but any amounts should be light.
From Alerts Broadcaster:
* This is one of the most difficult forecasts in recent years: significant wet snow is still likely from New York suburbs into interior New England, but major city centers from New York to Boston wavering on rain-snow line, making final snowfall prediction even more problematic than typical.
* Rain mixes with snow Thursday; some melting on contact with warmer surfaces in New York City and Boston – but a slushy accumulation is still expected, with the greatest potential for accumulation Thursday night over the colder suburbs. Precipitation ends as light rain Friday; by then plowable amounts of wet snow are expected.
* 1-2″ liquid water from this slow-moving coastal storm: high water content reduces risk of blowing/drifting, but increases potential for power outages, especially NYC suburbs to Providence and western suburbs of Boston.
High Bust Potential. Our goal with these briefings is to be totally transparent; no media hype or bluster. When uncertainty is high we tell you so. And the risk of a “bust” is still very high with this storm, due to mild air off the Atlantic being absorbed into this Nor’easter. To pick up all snow temperatures in the lowest mile of the atmosphere need to be (consistently) below freezing. Latest models indicate a thin layer of warm air near the ground Thursday, which may result in a rain-snow mix from New York City to Boston (better chance of heavy wet snow just inland, over the suburbs). Even so, a plowable accumulation (at least 3-4″) is still very possible from Manhattan to downtown Boston, enough to disrupt some operations and complicate commutes and air travel. Heavy, wet, slushy snow with high water content will mean a minor to moderate risk of power outages Thursday and Thursday night.
Dueling Models. The latest NAM model above shows some 8-10″+ amounts from New York’s suburbs into Providence and the western suburbs of Boston (everything shaded in bright red). We’ve had a couple model runs in a row showing similar results, so there is some continuity from run to run. But the ECMWF (European) model is suggesting mostly rain for New York City and Boston; too much warm air sweeping in off the Atlantic for significant snowfall totals. That said, surface winds are forecast to blow more from the north than the east or northeast later today into Friday, which may tip precipitation over to mostly (wet) snow, especially inland. March storms are especially difficult; this one is no exception.
Rain-Snow Line. High resolution models valid Thursday night show the 32-degree F. isotherm running from Midtown Manhattan to Providence to Boston; mostly rain east of that line, mostly snow to the west over interior New England. This is why this forecast is so difficult; a 25-50 mile shift in that line could make the difference between mostly rain, and 6-12″ of heavy wet snow.
Statistics & Probabilities. Assuming a mix of rain and snow the most likely amount for much of New York’s 5 boroughs is something in the 4-8″ range by Friday morning. Of course there will be variations across the city, with the greatest potential for 10-12″+ amounts over central and eastern Long Island, and from northern New Jersey to Westchester and Fairfield counties. But if precipitation falls as (mostly) snow amounts could still be higher in the city, with a least a 20-25% probability of final amounts closer to 10-12″ before rain mixes in on Friday.
Boston Numbers. I expect a big variation in snowfall totals in the Boston area, a couple inches of slush near Boston Harbor to as much as 6-8″ Newtown and Waltham, maybe 1-2 foot amounts over southeastern Massachusetts to near Providence. Factor in coastal flooding (storm surge of 4-8 feet) and the next 48 hours will be see a significant risk to facilities from high winds, power outages and traffic disruptions.
Summary: one of my biggest pet peeves is having a meteorologist give me 4 different scenarios of what may happen. That’s not a forecast, but a wish-cast, an excuse to cover your butt for any eventuality. I’m still predicting a heavy, wet slop-storm of rain and snow from New York City to Boston, with just enough slush to shovel and plow – probably plowable for most neighborhoods – but the heaviest amounts over the suburbs, with a moderate risk of coastal flooding at high tide and sporadic power outages a very real possiblity, especially well inland, away from the coast.
This will NOT be as disruptive as the February 9 blizzard, but there will be substantial impacts on facilities, travel plans and the power grid. Odds still favor a messy mix for major city centers, which will keep final snow totals down. Suburban snow totals will be more significant with this sloppy, fickle Nor’easter. The forecast is rarely black or white, but usually some nebulous shade of gray. This is one of those moments; a very difficult forecast, but the potential for disruption to operations is still significant. Another update Thursday morning.
Extreme Weather Makeover: Has Abnormal Become The New Normal? Good question. The short answer is yes. Rick Montgomery has the story at The Kansas City Star; here’s an excerpt: “Those drought-damaged evergreens outside? Regional climatologists say to expect more in the years ahead. And the surreal mounds of snow now hiding shrubs that barely survived summer’s heat? Get used to that, too. It seems contradictory, this weird weather whiplash. But just consider the last couple of years in the nation’s midsection. Floods unleashed by record inflows into the Missouri River basin in early 2011. Then sudden and prolonged dryness. Now 20 to 25 inches of snow heaped on Kansas City in the most dramatic, back-to-back smacking delivered by any winter week that many of us can recall. Yet to experts who study climate change models, it makes sense. Think extreme…”
Photo credit above: “A man pushes a snowblower around a giant pile of snow left by road crews in the Country Club Plaza shopping district of Kansas City, Mo., Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013. For the second time in a week, a major winter storm paralyzed parts of the nation’s midsection Tuesday, dumping a fresh layer of heavy, wet snow atop cities still choked with piles from the previous system and making travel perilous from the Oklahoma panhandle to the Great Lakes. The weight of the snow strained power lines and cut electricity to more than 100,000 homes and businesses. At least three deaths were blamed on the blizzard.” (AP Photo/Orlin Wagner)
Predicting The Snows That Matter Most. In 1977 there was one weather model, the LFM. Now there are hundreds, even thousands of weather models. What to believe, when, and why? This article from UCAR delves into how ensemble modeling has revolutionized weather forecasting; here’s an excerpt: “…One reason why these eye-popping snowfall totals didn’t come as a surprise is the growth of ensemble prediction. Little more than a decade ago, U.S. forecasters had access to only a handful of fresh runs of computer models every few hours to guide their snow forecasts. Today, there’s not only a broader range of models, but some of these models are run multiple times, side by side, with small changes in the starting-point conditions that mimic the gaps in our less-than-perfect weather observing network. Such ensembles are helping forecasters deal with such high-impact threats as the “Snowquester” winter storm expected to strike the Washington, D.C., area this week…”
Severe Weather Preparedness Week. March 3-9 marks the official (nationwide) kick-off of Severe Weather Preparedness Week; here are some timely details and reminders of 2012 from FEMA: “Every year, thousands of people are impacted by severe weather threats such as tornadoes and severe thunderstorms. Preliminary data for 2012 shows there were more than 450 weather-related fatalities and nearly 2,600 injuries. Every state in the U.S. has experienced tornadoes and severe weather, and although some more than others, everyone is at risk. You can take steps to prepare for when severe weather strikes in your area. Knowing the most common weather hazards in your area, your vulnerability, and what actions you should take can save your life and others…”
Next Generation Weather Satellite Could Offer Earlier Warnings. GOES-R will enable meteorologists to see real-time lightning within thunderheads (from low-Earth orbit). Lightning, or a lack of lightning, can be a cue for tornado formation, one of many reasons why this new generation of weather satellites may help to improve severe storm forecasting. Here’s an excerpt from redOrbit.com: “…GOES-R, part of a scientific collaboration between NASA and NOAA, will be the next generation of geostationary weather satellites. The team claims GOES-R will provide continuous imagery and atmospheric measurements of Earth’s Western Hemisphere. Additionally, the GOES-R will monitor space weather, as well. This new satellite will also become the primary method for detection and tracking of hurricanes and severe weather. GOES-R will aid in the improvement of applications and products that will fulfill NOAA’s goals of Water and Weather, Climate, Commerce and Ecosystem. “These storms can spin up pretty quickly which limits warning lead-time,” said NOAA scientist Steve Goodman. “The radar and storm spotter’s view of tornadoes reaching the ground can be blocked by terrain, or visibility is very poor when the tornado is wrapped in rain. And it’s certainly more challenging for storm spotters to observe and confirm tornadoes occurring at night. Sometimes it’s just plain hard to come up with enough advance warning…”
Image Credit: Photos.com
The Dangers Of Space Weather. We’re all fixated on blizzards, tornadoes and meteorites, when our next unwelcome surprise could very well come from Earth’s nearest star. Geology.com has an interesting story on space weather; here’s an excerpt: “…With effective alerts and warning, we can limited the effects of space weather on real-time technology. For example, satellites can be adjusted, power grids can be modified, and polar flights can be rerouted. Scientists and forecasters work closely with government and university partners to develop prediction models and other tools to improve services to the nation’s space weather community. SWPC also helps move the latest computer models of solar dynamics and sun-Earth interactions into the daily operations of space weather prediction. NOAA and partner agencies in the National Space Weather Program are leading the way in this new era of space weather awareness to provide timely, accurate information and forecasts to help keep our advanced-technology global economy moving forward…” (Photo: NOAA).
“Ask Paul”. Weather-related questions, comments and assorted threats:
Has the definition of drought changed? I grew up during the Great Depression and drought mean farmers getting NO CROPS at all. How can this now be called a drought when the farmers continue to reap the biggest crops in the history of this country? As I peer out the windows of the senior’s bus I see small ponds along the roadside as we travel to Willmar. When one can see ponds, how can this be called drought? When I grew up they could plant tomatoes in lake bottoms (eg. West Norway Lake in Kandiyohi county); there are pictures to prove that statement. Now that was drought – when the lakes dried up! What has happened to the above definition? Could you address this in your column? Thanks.
(Name Withheld By Request)
Great question, and I realize there’s a disconnect when you look out at all that (new) snow in your yard, scratching your head, wondering how most of the state can be in severe/extreme drought? Frost levels are still 20-40 inches deep, which means melting snow will run off and not be able to soak into topsoil, where it’s needed. I teed up your question with Greg Spoden, State Climatologist for Minnesota. Here is his response:
The reader raises a fair point. Modern drought monitoring attempts to describe the continuum between the extraordinary conditions he observed during the 1930s drought and no drought at all. The most widely used tool for doing so is the U.S. Drought Monitor, a multi-agency effort to detect and identify the nation’s drought areas and assign those areas an intensity level. This effort requires a blend of science and subjectivity. Drought intensity categories are determined by the relative rarity of the climate anomaly (precipitation/temperature departures from average, length of the dry spell, etc), and the observed drought impacts. Some of those impacts are offered here.
In modern terms, the drought described by the reader would be classified as “D4 – Exceptional Drought”, the same conditions currently plaguing much of the Great Plains. Thankfully, Minnesota’s present drought status does not reach that level of severity. Minnesota’s drought is the result of a very dry summer and autumn 2012. Minnesota’s 2012 crop drank from subsoil reserves established during an incredibly wet May. Those reserves are now gone. The soil moisture profile is critically depleted. The white veneer of snow on the landscape lies upon a frozen topsoil that will allow little infiltration. To recover from our present drought situation, abundant spring rains are required after the soils thaw.
Greg Spoden, State Climatologist
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources – Division of Ecological and Water Resources
University of Minnesota – St. Paul Campus.
Thanks Greg – appreciate the additional information and perspective on the drought.
Washington D.C. Is The Worst During A Snowstorm. Very true, and I had a (rare) LOL moment reading this post of “Noquester” from buzzfeed.com. Definitely worth a look. If you’ve ever been to Washington D.C. or have family there, this will resonate.
Paul’s Conservation Minnesota Outlook for the Twin Cities and all of Minnesota:
* highs may top 40 again late next week.
Study Finds Climate Change To Open Arctic Sea Routes By 2050. Great news for shippers! Bad news for the rest of the planet, I fear. Here’s a portion of a story at NPR: “Climate change will make commercial shipping possible from North America to Russia or Asia over the North Pole by the middle of the century, a new study says. Two researchers at the University of California ran seven different climate models simulating two classes of vessels to see if they could make a relatively ice-free passage through the Arctic Ocean. In each case, the sea routes are sufficiently clear after 2049, they say. The study, published Monday in the journal PNAS by Laurence C. Smith and Scott R. Stephenson, found that the sea ice will become thin enough that a “corridor directly over the north pole” will open up. “The shortest great circle route thus becomes feasible, for ships with moderate ice-breaking capability…”
Photo credit above: “An iceberg in or just outside the Ilulissat fjord, which likely calved from Jakobshavn Isbrae, the fastest glacier in western Greenland, in May 2012. Polar ice sheets are now melting three times faster than in the 1990s.” Ian Joughin/AP
GAO Warns Climate Change Could Drain Federal Budget. Some of the same Congressional leaders who deny the reality of climate change are now experiencing sticker shock – the price tag for this new weather-on-steroids environment. Here’s an excerpt of a story at usgovinfo.about.com: “Apparently convinced that climate change will result in more frequent and more severe weather-related natural disasters, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports that the federal government is not well prepared to deal with the resulting financial losses. The threat of significant losses to the federal budget due to climate change topped the GAO’s 2013 list of government programs it considers to be at “high-risk” of resulting in financial losses or waste, fraud or abuse…”
The Climate Change Rebound. Here’s a clip of an interesting story (and poll) from The Brookings Institute: “…Notably, Obama’s retreat on this topic corresponded not only with policy reversals but also with decreased levels of public belief that climate change was occurring. Between 2008 and 2010, the National Surveys on Energy and the Environment (NSEE) from the University of Michigan and Muhlenberg College found a 20 point decline in the percentage of Americans who believed there is solid evidence of global warming. But as American acceptance of global warming rebounded in 2012 to levels approaching the peak level of belief that was found in 2008, Obama has once again taken a more aggressive public stance regarding the need for government action to address the issue…”
Climate-Change Science Poised To Enter Nation’s Classrooms. Here’s a segment of a story from InsideClimateNews.org and Bloomberg: “New national science standards that make the teaching of global warming part of the public school curriculum are slated to be released this month, potentially ending an era in which climate skepticism has been allowed to seep into the nation’s classrooms.The Next Generation Science Standards were developed by the National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the nonprofit Achieve and more than two dozen states. They recommend that educators teach the evidence for man-made climate change starting as early as elementary school and incorporate it into all science classes, ranging from earth science to chemistry...”
Photo credit above: “A study published on Jan. 6 in Nature Climate Change estimates more melting of the Freenland and Antarctica’s ice sheets than previously thought, which would raise sea levels and have “profound consequences for humankind.” Photographer: Alexandre Trouvilliez/CNRS/ice2sea
The Most Important Figure About The Oil Sands. Here’s an excerpt from Simon Donner at Maribo: “Are the oil sands a “carbon bomb”? Will the construction of new pipelines unleash this “bomb” on the climate? There’s lots of confusion about these questions. On Friday, the U.S. State Department’s released an assessment that stated the Keystone XL pipeline would have a negligible climate impact, essentially because a market analysis suggested that other options will arise for transporting additional carbon from the oil sands. Environmentalists are crying foul, energy and industry experts are arguing both sides, and pundits are wondering why the report was released on a Friday afternoon, when few people follow the news. It’s hard to know who to trust. The figure (above), based on one figure made by Keith Stewart from Greenpeace and shown to me by Mark Jaccard in the fall, suggests the answer to both questions could be considered “yes”, but not in the way people normally suggest…”
Graphic credit above: “The first column is existing, planned and announced oil sands projects; the orange bars are oil sands production in the IEA future scenarios. Production is assumed to be 80% of capacity, following the IEA methods.