62 F. high in the Twin Cities Wednesday.
58 F. average high for October 17.
58 F. high on October 17, 2011.
Trace of rain fell at KMSP yesterday.
32 mph: peak wind gust yesterday (1 pm).
.28″ rain predicted by midday Friday (00z NAM).
Mid-60s Sunday; mildest day in sight.
3″ rain next Tuesday thru Thursday (ECMWF)
60-Hour Rainfall Forecast. The 4 km NAM from NOAA NCEP shows a huge variation in predicted rainfall amounts across the state; around .2″ for St. Cloud, closer to .3 to .4″ for the Twin Cities, but over an inch for far western Minnesota.
Sliding Into A Wetter Pattern? The ECMWF (European) model prints out over 3″ of rain between Tuesday and Thursday of next week. It’s still too early to celebrate (last Saturday’s rainy no-show comes to mind) but I’m seeing signs of more substantial moisture reaching Minnesota and Wisconsin by next week. In the meantime Sunday looks like the milder day of the weekend (mid 60s possible), with mild weather lingering into the first half of next week. By late next week it may feel a little more like early November out there.
Hold The Presses: A Real Storm? The ECMWF spins up a major storm over the Upper Midwest next Wednesday and Thursday, drawing on a large temperature contrast (baroclinicity) – a deep cyclone spinning up along the leading edge of a Novemberlike airmass. It looks promising, but it’s a week away – much that can change between now and then.
Warmest September On Record, Worldwide. “This is the 16th time that the world has set or tied a hot temperature record since 2000, according to NOAA. The last time the world set a cold temperature record was in December 1916, nearly 96 years ago…” – excerpt from a story at Sci-Tech Today; details and links below. Image: NOAA NCDC.
“…Thanks to large-scale heat waves and a massive drought, 2012 has been the most extreme weather year on record in the lower 48 states, as measured by the National Climatic Data Center’s Climate Extremes…” – excerpt from a Climate Central story, details below.
Today’s Weather Map. The WRF model, valid at 4 pm today, shows a deep area of low pressure centered close to the Twin Cities, the heaviest rain bands surrounding the metro area – some .5 to 1″ rainfall amounts from the Red River Valley south to Sioux Falls and Des Moines. We will be in the “eye of the storm”, with .1 to .2″ rain possible in the Twin Cities. Strong to severe T-storms push into the Mid Atlantic region, while the west stays dry. A big contrast in air pressure whips up some 30-50+ mph winds over the Dakotas, where High Wind Warnings are posted by NWS.
Drought Update: June Thru Mid-October 2012. Details from the Minnesota Climatology Working Group: “The moisture deficits in southern Minnesota developed rapidly due to very hot and very dry conditions during the mid-summer and into the autumn. Over the period, rainfall totals in many Minnesota counties fell short of average by six or more inches. This is the climatological equivalent of missing nearly two months of growing season precipitation. In some southern Minnesota communities, mid-summer through autumn rainfall deficits are in excess of eight inches.”
Rainfall Needed To Break The Drought. According to NOAA and USDA anywhere from 5 to 10.5″ of rain is necessary to erase the impact of a deepening drought. We’re heading into a wetter pattern, but it’s doubtful we’ll see this much rain, statewide, before the ground freezes up solid within 30-40 days. Map above: Ham Weather.
Expanding Drought. On a national scale you can see, at a glance, how much rain is required to end the drought. Although the worst conditions extend from the Rockies to the Midwest, unusually dry weather is showing up from Georgia (10.5″ deficit) to the D.C. area (7.7″ rainfall shortage). Map: USDA, NOAA and Ham Weather.
Winter Is Back In Breck. Nothing better than snow-covered pumpkins – courtesy of the town of Breckenridge, Colorado.
The World’s Most Powerful Climate Change Supercomputer Powers Up. Here’s the intro to a fascinating story at Time Magazine: “For all the political discord over climate change, one thing everyone can probably agree on is that when you’re throwing computational resources at modeling weather, the more the merrier. Think of the new computer that just came online at the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center in Cheyenne, Wyoming as a kind of dream come true from a meteorological standpoint, then, because it represents a mammoth increase in raw crunch-prowess, dedicated to studying everything from hurricanes and tornadoes to geomagnetic storms, tsunamis, wildfires, air pollution and the location of water beneath the earth’s surface…”
Photo credit above: Carlye Calvin / NCAR. “A fish-eye view of some of the Yellowstone supercomputer’s 100 racks. An iconic scene from Yellowstone National Park is featured mosaic-style on the ends of each rack.”
Weekend Details. The ECMWF suggests patchy clouds Saturday morning, enough PM clearing for highs in the low to mid 50s. Sunday looks sunnier and 5-10 degrees milder with a south breeze and highs well up into the 60s. Note to self: get your power-leaf-raking done on Sunday. A soggy-leaf-alert is in effect next week.
Leave Me Alone! There’s a kid in that pile of leaves…Crosby. Thanks to his dad, WeatherNation TV meteorologist Todd Nelson, for sending this in from St. Michael.
Paul’s Conservation Minnesota Outlook for the Twin Cities and all of Minnesota:
Climate Change “Footprint” Cited In Disaster Loss Trends. Meteorologist Andrew Freedman helps to connect the dots in this Climate Central story – here’s an excerpt: “…The new and most controversial finding in the report is that the upward trend in weather-related disaster losses is being driven in part by manmade global warming, since previous studies have shown that socioeconomic factors, such as population growth and urban sprawl, are behind this trend. At the same time, however, studies have increasingly found that global warming is already making certain types of extreme weather events, such as heat waves and precipitation extremes, more likely to occur and more severe. The study, which Munich Re described as being aimed partly at galvanizing action on global warming, discusses ties between global warming and thunderstorm-related losses, which peaked in 2011. That year there was $26 billion in insured property losses from thunderstorm-related hazards, such as hail, strong winds, and tornadoes. The study concludes that both urban sprawl and climate change are drivers of the increased thunderstorm costs.…”
Graphic credit above: “2012 has, so far, had the most extreme weather on record in the lower 48 states, according to the Climate Extremes Index.” Credit: NOAA/NCDC.
Climate Change A No-Show Again, Despite Debate’s Energy Focus. Here’s an excerpt from The Hill’s Energy and Environment Blog: “….“Both candidates vied to restate their commitment to more dirty oil, gas and coal production while ignoring the contradiction between an ‘all of the above’ energy program and reducing emissions of climate disrupting gases,” said Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth Action, in a statement. Candy Crowley of CNN, the debate moderator, indicated afterward that she had a climate change question ready but was unable to get to it. Much of the debate time was taken up by the candidates interrupting each other, as well as Crowley. The liberal Chris Hayes of MSNBC, during the network’s post-debate analysis, likened the climate-free energy portion to discussing smoking without discussing cancer.”
Is David Axelrod To Blame For Climate Change’s Absence From The Election? The Atlantic speculates – here’s a clip: “Warming could be a winning issue, but President Obama isn’t pushing on it — and experts finger one of his top aides as the culprit. “It was always going to be the case that whenever the visible reality of climate change became so painfully obvious that you couldn’t deny it any more, that it was going to flip over to a winning issue. The question was: When was that going to happen?” So said Joseph Romm, the former Clinton energy official and popular blogger behind Climate Progress, at the first Climate Desk Live briefing at the Mott House on Capitol Hill. Romm and his fellow panelists — strategist Betsy Taylor of Breakthrough Strategies and Solutions and consultant Paul Bledsoe, who worked in the Clinton White House on climate communications — were in strong agreement that the weather of the last year has transformed climate change into the type of issue that could impact the 2012 election, simply because most Americans now feel directly affected by it. That emphatically includes independents and swing voters….” Photo: politico.
Hot September: Man-Made Global Warming At Work. Here’s an excerpt from Sci-Tech Today: “The world last month matched a record for the hottest September, and some scientists point to global warming as a cause. It was the third time since 2000 that the world set or tied a heat record for September. Previous hot September records were set in 2003 and 2005. The records go back to 1880. Last month’s average temperature was 60.2 degrees (15.6 Celsius) Fahrenheit worldwide, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday. Why September? It might be the lengthening of the Northern Hemisphere summer as a result of man-made global warming and the loss of Arctic sea ice that indirectly helps cool other parts of the world, said University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver...”
Computer Models Of Earth’s Climate Change Confirmed on Mars. The story from Reuters and wkzo.com: “WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Computer models have accurately forecast conditions on Mars and are valid predictors of climate change on Earth, U.S. and French astronomers said on Tuesday. These computer programs predicted Martian glaciers and other features on Earth’s planetary neighbor, scientists found. “Some public figures imply that modeling of global climate change on Earth is ‘junk science,’ but if climate models can explain features observed on other planets, then the models must have at least some validity,” lead researcher William Hartmann of the Planetary Science Institute said in a statement. The team’s findings were presented at the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society’s planetary sciences division in Reno, Nevada…”
Warming Lakes: Effects Of Climate Change Seen On Lake Tahoe. National Geographic takes a look – here’s a snippet from the story: “Lake Tahoe is one of hundreds of lakes around the world in the midst of a warming trend. The effects of climate change are starting to complicate efforts to maintain the lake’s relatively pristine state, putting Tahoe’s sapphire blue water and its overall ecological health at risk. Surrounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountains and stunning scenery, the lake straddles the border between California and Nevada. At 1,645 feet deep, Lake Tahoe is one of the deepest lakes in the world. It is also one of the world’s oldest, at about two million years. Water resides in the lake for about six hundred years and flows out through only one outlet: the Truckee River...”
Photo credit above: Lake Tahoe. Photo by Brent Allen, TERC.
Republicans, Once Again, See Evidence Of Global Warming. Slate.com has the story and Pew poll results; here’s a clip: “…According to a new survey from the Pew Research Center, 48 percent of self-identified Republicans said there is “solid evidence” of climate change. That number is up 5 points from last year and 13 points from 2009. Still the figure is lower than what it was in 2006 and 2007, and right about where it stood in 2008.
A majority of moderate and liberal Republicans (58%) say there is solid evidence of warming, including 38% who say it is mostly due to human activity. By contrast, only 43% of conservative Republicans say there is evidence of warming, while 51% say there is not. However, more conservative Republicans say there is evidence of warming than did so last year. In 2011, just 31% said the earth has been warming while 60% said there was no solid evidence of warming…”
Did “Global Warming Really Stop In 1997?” The short answer is no. Anyone can cherry-pick specific beginning and ending dates to “prove” virtually anything, but as msnbc.com points out in this article, the truth of what’s happening worldwide is apparent: “Claims global warming stopped 15 years ago are based on “cherry-picked” data and don’t account for natural fluctuations in climate, according to climate scientists responding to an article that appeared Saturday (Oct. 13) in the British newspaper, The Daily Mail. The article cites combined global land and sea-temperature data compiled by British climate researchers, claiming that between August 1997 and August 2012, “ there was no discernable rise in aggregate global temperatures.” The implication, writes the article’s author David Rose, is that computer models, including those used by UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are flawed and have made overly dire predictions…”