Voting Records

What We Track
We track key conservation bills and inform Minnesotans of their legislators' decisions.
Recent Votes & Actions
Senate voted Yes
Yes = 5825 Republicans | 31 Democrats | 2 IndependentsNo = 99 Republicans

What a yes means

A “Yes” vote means Minnesota's existing energy efficiency programs would be enhanced to support new technologies and consumer choices while providing more jobs in the energy efficiency sector.

House voted Yes
Yes = 8818 Republicans | 70 DemocratsNo = 4646 Republicans

What a yes means

A “Yes” vote means Minnesota's existing energy efficiency programs would be enhanced to support new technologies and consumer choices while providing more jobs in the energy efficiency sector.

House voted Yes
Yes = 701 Republican | 69 DemocratsNo = 6363 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote passes House SF 959 off of the House floor, advancing the bill toward comparison and consideration with its Senate equivalent through a conference committee.

House voted No
Yes = 6969 DemocratsNo = 6464 Republicans

What a no means

A "no" vote rejects the decision of the Speaker and consideration of the amendment continues, allowing a motion to prohibit the MPCA from adopting Clean Cars rules.

House voted Yes
Yes = 7070 DemocratsNo = 6464 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote passes House SF 972 which makes progress toward limiting Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to a clean energy future. This then advances the bill toward comparison and consideration with its Senate comparison through a Conference Committee.

Senate voted No
Yes = 3131 DemocratsNo = 3634 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote does not create a program for implementing environmental justice cumulative impact analysis.

Senate voted No
Yes = 332 Republicans | 31 DemocratsNo = 3432 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote allows for the creation of an open hunting season for gray wolves. If enacted, this provision would allow the hunting of gray wolves across the state.

Senate voted No
Yes = 281 Republican | 27 DemocratsNo = 3833 Republicans | 3 Democrats | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote allows for rolling back water quality protections.

Senate voted Yes
Yes = 5825 Republicans | 31 Democrats | 2 IndependentsNo = 99 Republicans

What a yes means

A “Yes” vote means Minnesota's existing energy efficiency programs would be enhanced to support new technologies and consumer choices while providing more jobs in the energy efficiency sector.

Senate voted No
Yes = 3131 DemocratsNo = 3634 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote does not create a program for implementing environmental justice cumulative impact analysis.

Senate voted No
Yes = 332 Republicans | 31 DemocratsNo = 3432 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote allows for the creation of an open hunting season for gray wolves. If enacted, this provision would allow the hunting of gray wolves across the state.

Senate voted No
Yes = 281 Republican | 27 DemocratsNo = 3833 Republicans | 3 Democrats | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote allows for rolling back water quality protections.

Senate voted No
Yes = 3131 DemocratsNo = 3634 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote does not create a local climate resiliency program.

Senate voted No
Yes = 3131 DemocratsNo = 3634 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote means improved greenhouse gas reduction goals were not included in SF 972.

Senate voted Yes
Yes = 3934 Republicans | 3 Democrats | 2 IndependentsNo = 2828 Democrats

What a yes means

A "yes" vote passes the SF 972 Energy & Commerce Omnibus Bill through the Minnesota State Senate. Once passed, the bill will be reviewed against the House version of the omnibus bill and debated through a Conference Committee, from which compromise legislation will be produced.

Senate voted No
Yes = 3131 DemocratsNo = 3634 Republicans | 2 Independents

What a no means

A "no" vote means statutory guidelines were not put in place for Minnesota to generate carbon free energy by 2040. No guidelines were put in place to address pollution in areas of environmental justice or wages of workers in the energy sector.

House voted Yes
Yes = 8818 Republicans | 70 DemocratsNo = 4646 Republicans

What a yes means

A “Yes” vote means Minnesota's existing energy efficiency programs would be enhanced to support new technologies and consumer choices while providing more jobs in the energy efficiency sector.

House voted No
Yes = 6969 DemocratsNo = 6464 Republicans

What a no means

A "no" vote rejects the decision of the Speaker and consideration of the amendment continues, allowing a motion to prohibit the MPCA from adopting Clean Cars rules.

House voted Yes
Yes = 701 Republican | 69 DemocratsNo = 6363 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote passes House SF 959 off of the House floor, advancing the bill toward comparison and consideration with its Senate equivalent through a conference committee.

House voted Yes
Yes = 7070 DemocratsNo = 6464 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote passes House SF 972 which makes progress toward limiting Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to a clean energy future. This then advances the bill toward comparison and consideration with its Senate comparison through a Conference Committee.

House voted Yes
Yes = 10025 Republicans | 75 DemocratsNo = 3434 Republicans

What a yes means

A “yes” vote means funding created to allow critical infrastructure projects to move forward.

House voted No
Yes = 6358 Republicans | 5 DemocratsNo = 6969 Democrats

What a no means

A "no" vote means the MPCA continues to have authority to propose clean car standards.

House voted Yes
Yes = 849 Republicans | 75 DemocratsNo = 4949 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote means funds from the Renewable Development account are allocated to four clean energy projects.

House voted Yes
Yes = 11037 Republicans | 73 DemocratsNo = 2121 Republicans

What a yes means

A "yes" vote means the habitat projects recommended by the legislative-citizen council receive Outdoor Heritage Funds and may move forward.